The Effectiveness of Multi-Stakeholder Networks in the Implementation of Hydrometeorological Disaster Risk Reduction Policies: Systematic Literature Network Analysis

Ridwan Caesar (1)
(1) Universitas Al-Ghifari

Abstract

The effectiveness of multi-stakeholder collaborative networks versus government-centric approaches inimplementing hydrometeorological disaster risk reduction policies has not been comprehensively understood. Thisstudy conducted a Systematic Literature Network Analysis (SLNA) to synthesize evidence of effectiveness and map theresearch landscape through the integration of a systematic review with bibliometric analysis. SLNA combined asystematic review (PRISMA guidelines) with bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer and bibliometrix. A systematicsearch in Scopus (2015-2025) used multi-concept strings: multi-stakeholder networks, disaster risk reduction,hydrometeorological disasters, and policy implementation. The analysis included citation networks, keyword cooccurrencemapping, and temporal evolution tracking with triangulation of systematic and bibliometric findings. Of the480 records, 45 final studies showed that 84% of the research confirmed the superior effectiveness of collaborativenetworks: higher community participation (68% vs. 31%), faster response time (2.3 hours), and superior sustainability(78% vs. 43%). Bibliometric analysis identified six cluster themes: governance models, coordination mechanisms,stakeholder composition, disaster contexts, effectiveness outcomes, and geographic contexts. The temporal evolutionshows a growth from 72 publications (2015-2017) to 284 publications (2021-2024) with a transition of keywords towards"network governance," "collaborative resilience," and "digital platforms." SLNA reveals the convergence of collaborativegovernance-network theory-disaster management with emerging frontiers in digital governance integration. SLNAconfirms the superior effectiveness of collaborative networks and reveals a dynamic research landscape with promisingemerging themes for future exploration. The findings inform a network-based implementation framework andcollaborative governance policy reform. The SLNA methodology proves effective for understanding holistic knowledgeevolution and identifying research priorities based on quantitative evidence.Keywords: systematic literature network analysis; multi-stakeholder networks; disaster risk reduction; collaborativegovernance; bibliometric analysis; policy implementation; hydrometeorological disasters.

Authors

Ridwan Caesar

How to Cite

The Effectiveness of Multi-Stakeholder Networks in the Implementation of Hydrometeorological Disaster Risk Reduction Policies: Systematic Literature Network Analysis. (2025). Proceeding International Conference On Sustainable Environment And Innovation (ICOSEI), 1(1). https://doi.org/10.53675/icosei.v1i1.1617

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public

Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571.

Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and

effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229-252.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated

guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLOS Medicine, 18(3), e1003583.

Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., et al. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in

systematic reviews. ESRC Methods Programme, University of Lancaster.

Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems.

Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441-473.

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of i