Integrating Socio-Technical Perspectives in University Learning: The Importance of Socio-Technical Inquiry Learning (STIL) for Preparing Competent Graduates

Meiry Akmara Dhina (1) , Ida Kaniawati (2) , Ade Gafar Abdullah (3) , Lilik Hasanah (4)
(1) Universitas Al-Ghifari,
(2) Science Education Program, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia.,
(3) Electrical Engineering Education Program, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia,
(4) Science Education Program, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia

Abstract

Contemporary higher education faces the challenge of preparing graduates who are not only technically competent but also possess high social awareness. This article analyzes the importance of integrating socio-technical perspectives in university learning through the Socio-Technical Inquiry Learning (STIL) framework. Through literature review and learning practice analysis, this research demonstrates that traditional learning focused solely on content mastery is inadequate for preparing students to face the complexities of the modern workplace. The STIL framework integrates six socio-technical system components with five inquiry learning stages (5E Model) to create authentic and meaningful learning experiences. Analysis results show that STIL implementation can enhance systems thinking abilities, generic science skills, and students' social awareness. The primary recommendation is the adoption of the STIL framework in university curricula to produce graduates ready to face complex and dynamic professional challenges.

Authors

Meiry Akmara Dhina
Ida Kaniawati
Ade Gafar Abdullah
Lilik Hasanah

How to Cite

Integrating Socio-Technical Perspectives in University Learning: The Importance of Socio-Technical Inquiry Learning (STIL) for Preparing Competent Graduates. (2025). Proceeding International Conference On Sustainable Environment And Innovation (ICOSEI), 1(1). https://doi.org/10.53675/icosei.v1i1.1692

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References

Aditomo, A., Goodyear, P., Bliuc, A. M., & Ellis, R. A. (2013). Inquiry-based learning in higher education: Principal forms, educational objectives, and disciplinary variations. Studies in Higher Education, 38(9), 1239–1258. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.616584

Archer-Kuhn, B., & MacKinnon, G. (2020). Inquiry-based learning in higher education: A pedagogy of trust. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 32(2), 261-275. https://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/

Bider, I. (2024). Defining mechanisms for having a socio-technical system aligned. In Proceedings of Socio-Technical Perspectives in Information Systems 2024 (pp. 110-117). CEUR Workshop Proceedings. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3857/paper6.pdf

Bond, M., & Blevins, K. (2020). Systems thinking approaches to professional development in higher education contexts. Professional Development in Education, 46(3), 428-445. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1763435

Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. BSCS, 5, 88-98. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20127

Çalik, M., & Wiyarsi, A. (2024). The effect of inquiry-based learning on students' critical thinking skills in science education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(2), em2406. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14214

Chalmers, D., & Gardiner, D. (2015). The measurement and impact of university teacher development programs. Educar, 51(1), 53-80. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.655

Dhina, M. A., Kaniawati, I., Abdullah, A. G., & Hasanah, L. (2024). Integrating physics and sustainable technology in pharmaceutical education: A socio-technical approach. Sustainability Education, 1(1), 566-578. https://doi.org/10.25273/se.v1i1.2024

Justice, C., Rice, J., Roy, D., Hudspith, B., & Jenkins, H. (2009). Inquiry-based learning in higher education: Administrators' perspectives on integrating inquiry pedagogy into the curriculum. Higher Education, 58(6), 841-855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9228-1

Kamarudin, N., Hashim, S., & Mansor, M. (2024). Inquiry-based learning innovations in higher education: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Innovation, 15(2), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jei.2024.02.015

Moyer, T. (2024). Systems thinking in education: Recognizing patterns and relationships for improved decision-making. Mindful Education Quarterly, 12(3), 89-105. https://banyangloballearning.com/systems-thinking-education

Sadman, N. A. (2024). Systems thinking in chemical education: A paradigm shift towards holistic understanding. University of Northern Colorado Graduate Research Journal, 8(1), 45-62. https://www.unco.edu/graduate-research/sadman-2024

Spronken-Smith, R. (2012). Experiencing the process of knowledge creation: The nature and use of inquiry-based learning in higher education. In Proceedings of International Colloquium on Practices for Academic Inquiry (pp. 1–17). University of Otago Press.

Spronken-Smith, R., & Walker, R. (2010). Can inquiry-based learning strengthen the links between teaching and disciplinary research? Studies in Higher Education, 35(6), 723–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.482239

Swist, T., & Gulson, K. N. (2023). Instituting socio-technical education futures: Encounters with/through technical democracy, data justice, and imaginaries. Learning, Media and Technology, 48(2), 178-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2023.2205225

van Schalkwyk, S., Leibowitz, B., Herman, N., & Farmer, J. (2015). Reflections on professional learning: Choices, context and culture. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 46, 4-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.03.002

World Economic Forum. (2024). 5 ways to better teach systems thinking skills in education. Retrieved November 21, 2024, from https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/11/systems-thinking-has-great-potential-in-education-here-are-5-ways-to-deliver-it/