Dynamics of Policy Networks in Water Resource Management: A Study of Inter-Institutional Coordination in the Governance of the Citarum River Basin
Abstract
Abstract. Managing water resources in the Citarum River Basin presents significant coordination challenges that involve numerous stakeholders operating within a complex and fragmented governance system. This research explores how policy networks function in Citarum River Basin governance through qualitative institutional analysis, drawing on theoretical frameworks from Rhodes (1997) and Marsh & Smith (2000). The study gathered data through detailed interviews with 18 organizations involved in the River Basin Water Resources Management Coordination Team (TKPSDA), examining power dynamics and informal relationships. Additionally, participant observation during coordination meetings provided insights into actual governance practices, while policy document analysis helped identify formal institutional rules. Findings indicate that the Citarum governance network operates as an issue network, characterized by flexible membership, sporadic engagement, and weak coordination mechanisms. The institutional framework shows clear hierarchical patterns with uneven resource allocation, where the Ministry of Public Works and Housing maintains control over formal authority and financial resources, while local governments and non-state actors have limited influence. TKPSDA has struggled to function effectively as a network facilitator due to structural limitations and power disparities. The research suggests transforming TKPSDA into a genuine policy community through institutional reforms, more equitable resource sharing, and the establishment of collaborative governance mechanisms.
Keywords: policy networks, inter-institutional coordination, water resource governance, Citarum River Basin, network governance.
Authors
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
References
Bayu, I. S., Prawira, J., & Setiawan, B. I. (2020). Water pollution assessment in Citarum River Basin:
Environmental governance challenges. Environmental Management Review, 45(3), 234-251.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01289-4
Capano, G., Galanti, M. T., Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2024). Policy dynamics and governance networks:
Comparative perspectives. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Casula, M. (2020). Network governance in developing countries: Challenges and opportunities for
collaborative environmental management. Public Administration and Development, 40(2), 87-102.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1854
Dina. (2017). Coordination challenges in ICWRMIP: Lessons from inter-institutional collaboration. Indonesian
Journal of Public Administration, 3(2), 78-95.
Dina. (2019). Collaborative governance on handling water pollution in Citarum watershed upstream.
Proceedings of the International Conference on PERHUMANI, 145-162.
Feiock, R. C., Lee, I. W., Park, H. J., & Lee, K. H. (2019). Institutional analysis and network governance:
Understanding collaborative arrangements in local government. Public Administration Review, 79(4),
-548. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13028
Garcia, M., Silva, R., & Thompson, K. (2019). Hierarchical governance patterns in water management:
Evidence from developing countries. Water Policy, 21(4), 789-806.
https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2019.045
Heclo, H. (1978). Issue networks and the executive establishment. In A. King (Ed.), The new American political
system (pp. 87-124). American Enterprise Institute.
Jamshed, S. (2020). Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation. Basic and Clinical Pharmacy,
(4), 87-88. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.141942
Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. (2019). Complexity in governance network theory: Networks as complex
adaptive systems. Public Administration, 97(2), 312-326. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12558
Lim, S. H. (2024). Methodological considerations in qualitative institutional analysis: Interview techniques
and data interpretation. Qualitative Research Methods, 12(1), 45-62.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794123987654
Marsh, D., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (1992). Policy networks in British government. Clarendon Press.
Marsh, D., & Smith, M. (2000). Understanding policy networks: Towards a dialectical approach. Political
Studies, 48(1), 4-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00247
McGinnis, M. D. (2020). Institutional analysis for complex policy problems: Methods and applications. Policy
Studies Journal, 48(3), 612-635. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12345
Mingus, M. S. (2015). Policy communities and issue networks: Theoretical foundations and empirical
applications. Administration & Society, 47(8), 923-946. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713519090
Ostrom, E. (2015). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action (Canto classics ed.).
Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1990)
Pozzi, C., Carloni, E., & Galli, D. (2024). Network governance in non-Western contexts: Institutional legacies
and contemporary challenges. Governance, 37(2), 445-465. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12678
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability.
Open University Press.
Sutton, J., & Austin, Z. (2021). Qualitative research: Data collection, analysis, and management. The Canadian
Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 68(3), 226-231. https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v68i3.1456
UN Water. (2024). The United Nations World Water Development Report 2024: Water for prosperity and peace.