PARADIGMA E-DIPLOMACY: FORMULASI KEBIJAKAN PENGEMBANGAN SOFT POWER DIPLOMACY

Tri Darmawan Adimihardja, Gunawan Undang, Tom Finaldin

Abstract


Along with the industrial revolution (IR) 4.0, digital diplomacy or e-diplomacy is a necessity. However, these studies are still not widely developed. This article attempts to explain it – albeit with a very limited scope – from a public policy perspective. By using descriptive-qualitative method, the data source of this study was obtained from literature study. The results of the study show that e-diplomacy 4.0 is one part of the discipline of international relations, especially soft power diplomacy. After entering the early phase of society 5.0, diplomacy study actors have the opportunity to be more open to combining the two. Thus, a new paradigm is needed as the development of a conceptual framework for the study of international relations that develops in a multidisciplinary manner. The contribution of this article is the Paradigm Conceptual Framework of E-Diplomacy 4.0 and Society 5.0 as an effort towards e-diplomacy policy formulation. Through this paradigm, it is hoped that it will have implications for policy formulation efforts – by the government as a public policy actor – so that the participation and innovation of public soft power diplomacy in the digital field is more developed.Keywords: e-diplomacy paradigm – policy formulation – soft diplomacy 

Full Text:

PDF

References


J. Sachs, “The digital war on poverty,” guardian.co.uk, no. August, http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/aug/21/digitalmedia.mobilephones Page, pp. 1–2, 2008.

M. R. Ramadhani and A. R. Pratama, “Analisis Kesadaran Cybersecurity Pada Pengguna Media Sosial Di Indonesia.”

E. M. Husni and A. Fatulloh, “Kategorisasi Pengguna Internet di Kalangan Pelajar SD dan SMP Menggunakan Metode Twostep Cluster,” pp. 6–16, 2016.

Berliani Ardha, “Social Media Sebagai Media Kampanye Politik 2014 di Indonesia,” J. Visi Komun., vol. 13, no. 01, pp. 105–120, 2014.

T. Dharossa and T. Rezasyah, “Padjadjaran Journal of International Relations ( PADJIR ) Upaya Perlindungan WNI oleh Pemerintah Indonesia melalui,” PADJIR-Pajajaran J. Int. Relat., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 105–118, 2020, doi: 10.24198/padjir.v2i1.26055.

M. Sandelowski, “What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited,” Res. Nurs. Heal., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 77–84, 2010, DOI: 10.1002/nur.20362.

D. A. Abowitz and T. M. Toole, “Mixed Method Research: Fundamental Issues of Design, Validity, and Reliability in Construction Research,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 136, no. 1, pp. 108–116, 2010, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)co.1943-7862.0000026.

Y. Gabriel, “Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management : An Article information :” An Int. J., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 332–336, 2007.

E. Göktürk, “What is ‘ paradigm ’? Department of Informatics, University of Oslo Postbox 1080 Blindern 0316 Oslo, Norway erek@ifi.uio.no,” 2005.

J. H. Mittelman, “Globalization : An Ascendant Paradigm ?,” Int. Stud. Perspect., vol. 3, pp. 1–14, 2002.

C. Almeida and E. Báscolo, “Use of research results in policy decision-making, formulation, and implementation: A review of the literature,” Cad. Saude Publica, vol. 22, no. SUPPL., pp. 7–19, 2006, DOI: 10.1590/s0102-311x2006001300002.

J. E. Skok, “Policy Issue Networks and the Public Policy Cycle: A Structural-Functional Framework for Public Administration,” Public Adm. Rev., vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 325–332, 1995.

P. M. Falcone, A. Lopolito, and E. Sica, “Technological Forecasting & Social Change Instrument mix for the energy transition : A method for policy formulation,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., vol. 148, no. July, p. 119706, 2019, DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.07.012.

A. R. Mustopadidjaja, “Manajemen Proses Kebijakan Publik: Formulasi,” Implementasi, dan, 2002.

W. N. Dunn, Public policy analysis. Routledge, 2015.

P. DeLeon and L. DeLeon, “What Ever Happened to Policy Implementation ? An Alternative Approach,” JJ-PART-Journal Public Adm. Res. Theory; Oxford Acad., vol. 12, pp. 467–492, 2002.

H. Akib, “Implementasi Kebijakan: Apa, Mengapa, dan Bagaimana,” J. Adm. Publik, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2010.

B. L. Crosby, “Policy Implementation : The Organizational Challenge,” World Dev., vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1403–1415, 1996.

A. R. Khan and M. Rahman, “The Role of Evaluation at The Stages of Policy Formulation, Implementation and Impact Assessment,” 2017.

T. L. Wheelen, J. D. Hunger, A. N. Hoffman, and C. E. Bamford, Strategic management and business policy. Pearson Boston, MA, 2017.

S. Dwikardana et al., “Abstract: Transformasi strategi diplomasi di era digital: Identifikasi postur diplomasi digital di Indonesia,” Universitas Katholik Parahyangan, 2017.

M. F. Anshori, “Diplomasi Digital Sebagai Dampak Pandemi Global Covid-19: Studi Kasus Diplomasi Indonesia Di Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa (PBB),” Mandala J. Ilmu Hub. Internasional; FISIP UPN “Veteran”, Jakarta, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 100--119, 2020.

A. A. Slaughter et al., “International Law and International Relations Theory : A New Generation of Interdisciplinary Scholarship,” Am. J. Int. Law; JSTOR, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 367–397, 2014.

J. A. Caporaso, “Organization : International relations theory and multilateralism : the search for foundations International relations theory and multilateralism : the search for foundations,” Int. Organ. Cambridge Journals, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 599–632, 1992, DOI: 10.1017/S0020818300027843.

S. Burchill, “The National Interest in International Relations Theory,” in The National Interest in International Relations Theory, Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2005, pp. 206–207.

C. Hayden, “Scope, mechanism, and outcome : arguing soft power in the context of public diplomacy,” JIRD-Journal ofInternational Relations Dev., no. 2011, pp. 1–27, 2015, DOI: 10.1057/jird.2015.8.

G. D. Rawnsley, “China Talks Back: Public Diplomacy and Soft Power for the Chinese Century,” in Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, New York, 2008, p. 10.

B. Gill, “The United States and the China–Europe relationship,” in China-Europe Relations, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, New York, 2007, p. 7.

A. Bislev, “Student-to-Student Diplomacy: Chinese International Students as a Soft-Power Tool,” J. Curr. Chinese Aff. is an Open Access Publ., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 81–109, 2017, DOI: 10.1177/186810261704600204.

J. S. Nye, “Soft Power and Public Diplomacy Revisited,” vol. 14, pp. 7–20, 2019, DOI: 10.1163/1871191X-14101013.

P. Saib, “Toward a New Public Diplomacy,” in Chapter Eleven: The US Military and Public Diplomacy, Springer Link, 2009, pp. 217–2018.

A. Annisa, “Sejarah Revolusi Industri dari 1.0 sampai 4.0,” ResearchGate, no. January, 2021, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20215.24488.

D. Buckingham, “Is There a Digital Generation?,” in Digital Generations, 1st ed., Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, New York, 2006, p. 14.

C. Bjola, “Making sense of digital diplomacy,” in Digital Diplomacy, 1st, 2015th ed., Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, New York, 2015, p. 10.

C. Bjola, “Getting digital diplomacy right : what quantum theory can teach us about measuring impact,” Glob. Aff., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1–9, 2016, DOI: 10.1080/23340460.2016.1239388.

C. Bjola and J. Pamment, Countering Online Propaganda and Extremism: The Dark Side of Digital Diplomacy; Routledge New Diplomacy Studies. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, New York. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, New York, 2019.

D. Paschke, A. Mocan, and A. Draghic, “Industry 5.0 – The Expected Impact of Next Industrial Revolution,” Piran, Slovenia, 2019.

A. G. Pereira, T. M. Lima, and F. Charrua-Santos, “Industry 4 . 0 and Society 5 . 0 : Opportunities and Threats,” 2020. DOI: 10.35940/ijrte.D8764.018520.

B. Ozkeser, “Lean Innovation Approach in Industry 5.0, The Eurasia Proceedings of Science, Engineering & Mathematics (EPSTEM),” ISRES Publ., vol. 2, pp. 422–428, 2018.

C. R. Chapman, “The hazard of near-Earth asteroid impacts on earth,” vol. 222, pp. 1–15, 2004, DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2004.03.004.

C. Rumpf, H. G. Lewis, and P. M. Atkinson, “Acta Astronautica On the influence of impact effect modeling for global asteroid impact risk distribution,” Acta Astronaut., vol. 123, pp. 165–170, 2016, DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.03.015.

V. Garshnek, D. Morrison, and F. M. B. Jr, “The mitigation, management, and survivability of asteroid/comet impact with Earth,” vol. 16, pp. 213–222, 2000.

C. Cooper and B. K. Sovacool, “Not Your Father ’ s Y2K : Preparing the North American Power Grid for the Perfect Solar lead to a ‘‘ global,” Electr. J., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 47–61, 2011, DOI: 10.1016/j.tej.2011.04.005.

J. R. Alfonso, “Creative Homeland Security: Imagining the Next Big Solar Storm,” San Diego State University, 2012.

C. Phipps, “LISK-BROOM : A laser concept for clearing space junk Published by the American Institute of Physics,” pp. 1–4, 1994, DOI: 10.1063/1.46895.

J. N. Pelton, “Protecting Earth from Space Junk, Cosmic Hazards and Climate Change,” in Protecting Earth from Space Junk, Cosmic Hazards and Climate Change, Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017, 2017, pp. 127–139.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.53675/jgm.v4i1.991

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 478 times
PDF - 899 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexed