Demokrasi Radikal sebagai Alternatif Tatanan Politik Global dalam Konteks Multikulturalisme

Dewi Setiyaningsih

Abstract


This article discusses the relevancy of cosmopolitan democracy concept in multicultural world. It argues that cosmopolitan democracy concept is not enough in achieving a just and equal political order the context of plural world-citizenship, it showed by the practice of economic, social and political structure which prevails. Hence, this article tried to search an alternative in attempt to make the idea of cosmopolitan democracy become more realistic and inclusive by adopting radical democracy concept. Firstly, it discuss the critics of Kant’s cosmopolitan view using Spivak’s conception of Planetarity. Secondly, it discuss about the plural democracy by Mouffe’s in the context of planetarity. This combination that yields a plural democracy in the context of world-citizenship.Keywords: radical democracy, cosmopolitanism, world citizenship, global politics.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, B. (2016). Imagined communities. UK: Verso Books.

Appiah, K. A. (2010). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. New & London: W. W. Norton & Company.

Archibugi, D. H. (1995). Cosmopolitan Democracy. An Agenda for a New World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge: Polity Press.

Brown, G. W. (2009). Grounding Cosmopolitanism From Kant to the Idea of a Cosmopolitan Constitution. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.

Derrida, J. (1997). Cosmopolitanism and Forgiveness. London and New York: Routledge.

Held, D. (1995). Cosmopolitan Democracy and the Global Order: Reflections on the 200th Anniversary of Kant's "Perpetual Peace". Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, Vol. 20, No. 4 (1995), 415-429. https://doi.org/10.1177/030437549502000401

Held, D. (2001). The transformation of political community: rethinking democracy in the context of globalization. In I. S. Hacker-Cordon, Democracy's Edges (pp. 84 - 111). New York: Cambridge University Press.

.Mouffe, C. (2008). Which Order: Cosmopolitan or Multipolar. Ethical Perspective 15 No.4, 453-467. DOI:10.2143/EP.15.4.2034391

Mouffe, C. (2009). Democracy in a Multipolar World. Millennium: Journal of International Studies Vol.37 No.3, pp. 549–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829809103232

Mouffe, C. (2013). Democratic Citizenship and Political Community (1992). In J. Martin, Chantal Mouffe: Hegemony, radical democracy, and the political (pp. 103-114). London and New York: Routledge.

Nussbaum, M. C. (1997). Kant and Stoic Cosmopolitanism. The Journal of Political Philosophy vol.5 no.1 , 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00021

Sharp, J. B. (2004). Indigenous knowledges and development: a postcolonial caution. Third World Quarterly 25:4. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590410001678915

Smith, A. M. (1998). Laclau and Mouffe: The radical democratic imaginary. London and New York: Routledge.

Spivak, G. (2003). The Death of Discipline. New York USA: Columbia University Press.

Spivak, G. C. (2012). Cosmopolitanisms and the Cosmopolitical. Cultural Dynamics 24 (2-3) , 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0921374013482350

Trepanier, L. &. (2011). Cosmopolitanism in the Age of Globalization: Citizens without States. Kentucky: University of Kentucky Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.53675/jgm.v3i2.164

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 382 times
PDF - 2583 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexed