Distanced Online Learning in Language Teaching: From Students’ Perception

Adhi Nurhartanto, Tyas Desita Wengrum, Irene Brainnita Oktarin

Abstract


This quantitative study aims to analyze the impact of audiovisual content delivered through Canva, discussion forums via Zoom and online evaluations delivered via Mentimeter and Google Form in the Distanced Learning model delivered online. This study aims to measure students' perceptions of the learning environment that has drastically changed to online. The method that will be carried out in this study uses the Perceptions Blended Learning Environments Questionnaire (PBLEQ) method. This study aims to measure students' perceptions of the learning environment that has changed to online. The research steps included distributing online questionnaires to 68 students of the Public Health, Nutrition and Law study program, which contained questions about students' perceptions of changing face-to-face learning to online learning, on the contribution of online learning, and on online assignments. Then, more detailed questions were given in the interview session to validate the answers to the questionnaire. The results of online learning show that audiovisual content, discussion forums and online evaluations in distanced learning have a positive effect on the teaching and learning process. This study recommends the incorporation of mixed learning modalities during the planning and implementation of educational programs in the context of developing student competencies. It can be concluded that distanced and also blended learning is an alternative to improve teaching and learning conditions in the 21st Century.

 

Keywords :  Distanced Learning; Language Teaching; Technology


Full Text:

PDF

References


References

Fortune M, et. al. (2011). Students’ perceptions of online or face-to-face learning and social media in hospitality, recreation and tourism. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 7(1) pp 1-16.

Kemp, N. & Grieve, R. (2014). Face-to-face or face-to-screen? undergraduates’ opinions and test performance in classroom vs. online learning. Educational Psychology 5 pp. 1-14.

Tratnik, A. (2017). Student satisfaction with an online and a face-to-face Business English course in a higher education context. Journal Innovations in Education and Teaching International 15(1) pp. 1-10.

Bali,S & Liu, M.C. (2018). Students’ perceptions toward online learning and face-to-face learning courses J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1108 012094

Cakrawati, LM. (2017). Students’ perceptions on the use of online learning Platforms in EFL

Classrooms. English Language Teaching and Technology Journal (ELT-Tech Journal) Vol. 1 No. 1 Page: 22 – 30

Gürleyik, S. & Akdemir, E. (2018) Guiding Curriculum Development: Student Perceptions for the Second Language Learning in Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments. Journal of Education and Training Studies Vol. 6, No. 4; April 2018

Harefa S. & Sihombing GLA. (2021) Students’ perception of online learning amidst the Covid-19 pandemic: A study of junior, senior high school and college students in a remote area [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]. Research 2021. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.52152.1

Muthuprasad, T. et al. (2021). Students’ perception and preference for online education in India during COVID -19 pandemic. Social Sciences & Humanities Open 3 (2021). https:doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100101

Nur Agung ASS, et. al .(2020). Students’ Perception of Online Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study on the English Students of STKIP Pamane Talino. SOSHUM Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora [Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities] Volume 10, Number 2, 2020

Robbins, S. P. (2003). Organizational Behavior. New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Sugihartono, et. al. (2007). Psikologi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: UNY Pers

Stein, J., & Graham, C. R. (2014). Essentials for blended learning: A standards-based guide. New York: Routledge.

Prayitno, Haritz CN. 2013. Buku Digital. SEAMOLEC. Jakarta.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.53675/gist.v5i1.451

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 293 times
PDF - 168 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


klik4d

scatter hitam