INTERPERSONAL MEANING IN JOKOWI’S SPEECH A CASE STUDY at SUMMIT APEC

Firmansyah Nursyamsi, Arry Purnama, Hartono Hartono

Abstract


This study deals with analyzing language used for communication. It analyzed Jokowi’s speech at SUMMIT APEC, in Beijing from the perspective of SFL especially dealing with system of mood and modality. In other words, this study is about interpersonal meaning of the speech which can be used to dig up speaker’s attitudes and judgments towards what s/he is saying in the speech. In conducting this study, there are two objectives to achieve. The first, this study tried to describe the meaning of Jokowi’s speech based on interpersonal meaning by looking deeply on the mood system in Jokowi’s speech. The second, it also tried to describe how Jokowi influences the audiences through interpersonal meaning by looking deeply on modality. In Jokowi’s speech there are 94 data that found by the researcher. The data itself is realized by system of mood that divided into 78 data of declarative, 1 data of interrogative, and 15 data of imperative. The result of analysis showed that Jokowi mostly useD declarative. Jokowi used declarative because he wanted to share information to the audiences by delivering his speech. The information which is shared is mostly about investment. Jokowi wants the audiences or investors to invest in Indonesia. Besides that, based on data that has been analyzed through modality, the researcher found 29 data in Jokowi’s speech.  The data itself divided into 1 data of usuallity, 12 data of obligation, and 16 Inclination. In Jokowi’s speech, Jokowi mostly used inclination. Inclination occurs when someone has desire to do something for others. It means, Jokowi used inclination to influences the audiences. Inclination itself used to Jokowi to express his wishes. Jokowi wanted an audiences to invest in Indonesia.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, S. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka

Cipta.

Bloor, Thomas and Bloor, Meriel. 2004. The Functional Analysis of English. London: Arnold.

Butt, d, (et. al.). 1995. Using Functional Grammar. Sydney: National Centre for English Language, Teaching and Research.

Buttt, D., Fahey, R., Feez, S. 2003. Using Functional Grammar-- An Explorer’s Guide. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.

Derewianka, Beverly. 1990. Exploring How Texts Work. ….?

Deterding, David and Poedjosoedaro, Gloria. 2001. English Grammar. New York: Routledge.

Eggins, S. 1994. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Pinter Publishers Ltd.

Eggins, S. (2010) An Introduction to Systemic Functional Grammar. London: Continuum.

Gerot, L. And Wignell, P. 1994. Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Sidney Antipodean Educational Enterprise (AEE).

Hadi, S. 1983. Methodology Research. Yogyakarta: Yayasan Penerbitan Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Halliday, M.A.K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold Inc.

Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (second edition) London: Edward Arnold Inc.

Halliday, M.A.K. 2002. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Beijing: Foreign Language

Halliday, M.A.K. 2004. Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

Hammond, Jenny. et al. 1992. English for Social Purposes. Sydney: Macquarie University

Hornby, A.S. 2003. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. New York: Oxford University Press.

John W. Creswell. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed methods Approaches. Newbury Park: Sage Productions

Lehtonen,M. 2000. Cultural Analysis Of Texts. London: SAGE publication Ltd.

Lock, Graham. 1996. Functional English Grammar, USA: Cambridge University Press.

Martin, J.R. 1992. English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: The Netherlands: John Benjamins B.V.

Martin, J.R., Matthiessen, C. M. & Painter, C. (1997). Working with Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.

Matthiessen, C. , Lam, M., & Teruya , K. (2010). Key terms in systemic functional linguistics. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Moleong, LJ 1990. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Narbuko, Cholid, & Abu Achmadi. 1997. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Bumi Ak sara.

Sugiyono, Metode penelitian administrasi, Alfabeta, Bandung, 2004._________, Memahammi Penelitian Kualitatif, Alfabeta, Bandung, 2005.

Sujatna, Eva Tuckyta Sari. 2003. Komplemen Subjek dan Ko dalam Klausa Bahasa Inggris dan Padanannya Bahasa Indonesia, Bandung: Pasca Sarjana UNPAD

Sujatna, Eva Tuckyta Sari 2008a. Tata Bahasa Fungsional, Bandung: Uvula Press.

Sujatna, Eva Tuckyta Sari 2008b. English Syntax for Beginners: Revised edition, Bandung Uvula Press.

Sujatna, Eva Tuckyta Sari 2013. Understanding Systemic Functional Linguistics. Unpad Press.

White, P. R. R. 2000. Functional Grammar. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.

Young, L., & Harrison, C. 2004. Systemic functional linguistics and critical discourse analysis. London: Continuum.

Yule, G. (2010) The Study of Language (4th Ed). Cambridge: New York.

Journals

Ayoola, Moses Olusanya. 2013. An Interpersonal Meaning Analysis of Some Selected Political Advertisements in Some Nigerian Newspapers International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. Vol 3: page 165-178. [March, 23rd, 2018]

Benjamin Netanyahu: full speech on Palestinian state. [August, 3rd, 2018]

Feng, H. & Liu, Y. 2010. “Analysis of Interpersonal Metafunction in Public Speeches: A Case Study of Obama’s Speech”. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. Vol. 1. No. 6. pp. 825 –829. [March 30th, 2018]

Hakim, Lukman. Strategies of Constructing Appeals in Obama’s Victory Speech.

Semarang: [April, 16th, 2018]

Hastomo, Wisdiyan Hadi. 2011. The Interpersonal Meaning of Barack Obama’s Speech Entitled “America Will Never Be at War with Islam”. Semarang: : [April, 16th, 2018]

Nur, S. 2015. “Analysis of Interpersonal Metafunction in Public Speeches: A Case Study of Nelson Mandela’s Presidential Inauguration Speech”. The International Journals of Social Sciences. Vol. 30. No. 1. pp. 52 – 63. [February, 10th, 2018]

Wulandari, Dhiah Noor Aini. 2011. Interpersonal Meaning of BarackObama’s Speech at University of Indonesia: The Study of Barack Obama’s Attitudes and Judgments towards Indonesia. English Department Faculty of Languages and Arts Semarang State University [June, 27th, 2018]

Ye, R. 2010. The Interpersonal Metafunction Analysis of Barack Obama's. English Language Teaching. 146.www.ccsenet.org/elt. [April, 16th, 2018]

Electronic References

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo2jx_IFAoU

[January, 23rd, 2018]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/5535664/BenjaminNetanyahu-full-speech-on-Palestinianstate.html

[August, 3rd, 2018




DOI: https://doi.org/10.53675/gist.v1i1.32

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 526 times
PDF - 1544 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


klik4d

scatter hitam